Annual Insurance Review
Loading expected effects…
What it is
Reviewing your insurance coverage – health, auto, home or renters, life, disability, umbrella – once per year to confirm that coverage still matches your current life circumstances and that you’re not paying for over-coverage or under-insured for likely scenarios. The review takes 30–90 minutes and typically surfaces one or both of: (a) coverage gaps where a meaningful loss would not be reimbursed, (b) over-coverage where premium dollars could be redirected to higher-leverage uses. Insurance products in particular drift from their original fit because life events (marriage, children, home purchase, career change) shift the risk landscape; insurance premiums also drift upward over time, so re-shopping at renewal can yield meaningful savings.
Sources and key statistics
- Annual review of all active insurance policies, with renewal-time competitor quotes on commodity policies (auto, home/renters); the review takes 30–90 minutes and typically yields both better fit and lower premium
- J.D. Power and Consumer Reports research consistently finds that adults who shop at renewal save substantially more on premiums than adults who renew passively, with median savings reported in the 10–20% range for auto insurance
- The review also catches under-insurance: LIMRA research finds that ~40% of US adults are under-insured on life insurance relative to their dependents’ financial needs
- Best done at policy renewal time when you have leverage to switch; for users with multiple policies, batching them all in the same month makes the annual review easier
Cost
- Upfront cost: $0
- Ongoing cost: $0/year
- Upfront time: 1.5 hours
- Ongoing time: 1 hour/year
Personalise these costs
Override the population estimates with your own. Saved to your profile and used to recalculate Time and Money EROIs.
How to do it
- Inventory your current policies: health, auto, home or renters, life, disability, umbrella, and any specialty coverage (jewellery, electronics, professional liability)
- For each policy, check: deductibles relative to your emergency fund, coverage limits relative to current asset levels, beneficiary designations on life insurance (see Set Beneficiary Designations), and whether bundling discounts have been applied
- Get fresh quotes at renewal time on commodity insurance (auto, home/renters): premiums typically drift upward at renewal even with no claim history, and competitor quotes give leverage to renegotiate or switch
- Specifically check life and disability coverage against your current dependents and income; under-insurance here is the most common gap and the consequences are severe
What success looks like
- Every active policy has been reviewed in the last 12 months and matches your current life circumstances
- You have a written record of coverage limits, deductibles, and renewal dates
- You haven’t paid for an obviously redundant policy (e.g. car-rental insurance from the rental company when your auto policy or credit card already covers it)
Common pitfalls
- Reviewing existing policies but not getting competitor quotes; renewal premiums often drift up substantially without any change in coverage and re-shopping can save 10–30%
- Over-correcting toward minimum coverage; deductibles too high relative to your emergency fund, or coverage limits too low relative to asset value, can create catastrophic-loss exposure that the savings don’t justify
- Skipping life and disability insurance review; under-insurance here is the most common and most consequential gap, and the right amount changes meaningfully with each major life event
Prerequisites
- Active insurance policies – at minimum the user has health and either auto or rental insurance, plus optionally home, life, disability, and umbrella policies
- Access to current policy documents and renewal dates
Expected effects across life areas
| Life area | Value | PBS | ISR | UAR | Confidence | Baseline (population percentile) | EBS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial Planning Tracking | Accuracy & control | 5 | 90% | 70% | medium | 35th | … |
| Emergency Preparedness | Catastrophic resilience | 7 | 5% | 70% | medium | 35th | … |
Detailed Scoring
Scoring uses a logarithmic scale from 0 to 10, where each unit increase represents roughly double the impact. Learn more about ROI calculations.
Financial Planning Tracking – Accuracy & control
Anchor: Percentage of total spending accurately tracked and categorised
Logarithmic Scale:
- Score 10: 100% of spending tracked with real-time multi-account accuracy
- Score 8: 25% of spending tracked with consistent categorisation
- Score 6: 6% of spending tracked in any systematic way
- Score 4: 1-2% of spending tracked beyond rough mental estimates
- Score 2: Less than 1% of spending tracked; no idea where money goes
- Score -2: ~1% reduction in spending tracked
- Score -4: ~4% reduction in spending tracked
- Score -6: ~16% reduction in spending tracked
- Score -8: ~62% reduction in spending tracked
- Score -10: Near-total collapse of spending tracking
Emergency Preparedness – Catastrophic resilience
Anchor: Change in preparedness for rare but severe societal disruptions
Logarithmic Scale:
- Score 10: Transformative gain in catastrophic-scenario preparedness
- Score 8: Major gain in catastrophic-scenario preparedness
- Score 6: Meaningful gain in catastrophic-scenario preparedness
- Score 4: Modest gain in catastrophic-scenario preparedness
- Score 2: Slight, barely noticeable gain in catastrophic-scenario preparedness
- Score -2: Slight, barely noticeable reduction in catastrophic-scenario preparedness
- Score -4: Modest reduction in catastrophic-scenario preparedness
- Score -6: Meaningful reduction in catastrophic-scenario preparedness
- Score -8: Major reduction in catastrophic-scenario preparedness
- Score -10: Severe damage to catastrophic-scenario preparedness